@inproceedings{Howcroft2017,
title = {Psycholinguistic Models of Sentence Processing Improve Sentence Readability Ranking},
author = {David M. Howcroft and Vera Demberg},
url = {http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/E17-1090},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-10-17},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 1, Long Papers},
pages = {958-968},
publisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},
address = {Valencia, Spain},
abstract = {While previous research on readability has typically focused on document-level measures, recent work in areas such as natural language generation has pointed out the need of sentence-level readability measures. Much of psycholinguistics has focused for many years on processing measures that provide difficulty estimates on a word-by-word basis. However, these psycholinguistic measures have not yet been tested on sentence readability ranking tasks. In this paper, we use four psycholinguistic measures: idea density, surprisal, integration cost, and embedding depth to test whether these features are predictive of readability levels. We find that psycholinguistic features significantly improve performance by up to 3 percentage points over a standard document-level readability metric baseline.},
pubstate = {published},
type = {inproceedings}
}