Publications

Deep neural networks have been employed for various spoken language recognition tasks, including tasks that are multilingual by definition such as spoken language identification (LID). In this paper, we present a neural model for Slavic language identification in speech signals and analyze its emergent representations to investigate whether they reflect objective measures of language relatedness or non-linguists’ perception of language similarity. While our analysis shows that the language representation space indeed captures language relatedness to a great extent, we find perceptual confusability to be the best predictor of the language representation similarity.

• https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.vardial-1.12

@inproceedings{abdullah_etal_vardial2020,
title = {Rediscovering the Slavic Continuum in Representations Emerging from Neural Models of Spoken Language Identification},
author = {Badr M. Abdullah and Jacek Kudera and Tania Avgustinova and Bernd M{\"o}bius and Dietrich Klakow},
url = {https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.vardial-1.12},
year = {2020},
date = {2020},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on NLP for Similar Languages, Varieties and Dialects (VarDial 2020)},
pages = {128-139},
publisher = {International Committee on Computational Linguistics (ICCL)},
address = {Barcelona, Spain (Online)},
abstract = {Deep neural networks have been employed for various spoken language recognition tasks, including tasks that are multilingual by definition such as spoken language identification (LID). In this paper, we present a neural model for Slavic language identification in speech signals and analyze its emergent representations to investigate whether they reflect objective measures of language relatedness or non-linguists’ perception of language similarity. While our analysis shows that the language representation space indeed captures language relatedness to a great extent, we find perceptual confusability to be the best predictor of the language representation similarity.},
pubstate = {published},
type = {inproceedings}
}

Copy BibTeX to Clipboard

Within the first shared task on machine translation between similar languages, we present our first attempts on Czech to Polish machine translation from an intercomprehension perspective. We propose methods based on the mutual intelligibility of the two languages, taking advantage of their orthographic and phonological similarity, in the hope to improve over our baselines. The translation results are evaluated using BLEU. On this metric, none of our proposals could outperform the baselines on the final test set. The current setups are rather preliminary, and there are several potential improvements we can try in the future.

• https://aclanthology.org/W19-5425
• https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-5425

@inproceedings{csplMT,
title = {Machine Translation from an Intercomprehension Perspective},
author = {Yu Chen and Tania Avgustinova},
url = {https://aclanthology.org/W19-5425},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-5425},
year = {2019},
date = {2019},
booktitle = {Proc. Fourth Conference on Machine Translation (WMT), Volume 3: Shared Task Papers},
pages = {192-196},
address = {Florence, Italy},
abstract = {Within the first shared task on machine translation between similar languages, we present our first attempts on Czech to Polish machine translation from an intercomprehension perspective. We propose methods based on the mutual intelligibility of the two languages, taking advantage of their orthographic and phonological similarity, in the hope to improve over our baselines. The translation results are evaluated using BLEU. On this metric, none of our proposals could outperform the baselines on the final test set. The current setups are rather preliminary, and there are several potential improvements we can try in the future.},
pubstate = {published},
type = {inproceedings}
}

Copy BibTeX to Clipboard

In CHAPTER I, I first introduce the thesis in the context of the project workflow in section 1. I then summarise the methods and findings from the project publications about the languages in focus. There I also introduce the relevant concepts and terminology viewed in the literature as possible predictors of intercomprehension and processing difficulty. CHAPTER II presents a quantitative (section 4) and a qualitative (section 5) analysis of the results of the cooperative translation experiments. The focus of this thesis – the language pair PL-CS – is explained and the hypotheses are introduced in section 6. The experiment website is introduced in section 7 with an overview over participants, the different experiments conducted and in which section they are discussed. In CHAPTER IV, free translation experiments are discussed in which two different sets of individual word stimuli were presented to Czech readers: (i) Cognates that are transformable with regular PL-CS correspondences (section 12) and (ii) the 100 most frequent PL nouns (section 13). CHAPTER V presents the findings of experiments in which PL NPs in two different linearisation conditions were presented to Czech readers (section 14.1-14.6). A short digression is made when I turn to experiments with PL internationalisms which were presented to German readers (14.7). CHAPTER VI discusses the methods and results of cloze translation experiments with highly predictable target words in sentential context (section 15) and random context with sentences from the cooperative translation experiments (section 16). A final synthesis of the findings, together with an outlook, is provided in CHAPTER VII.

---

In KAPITEL I stelle ich zunächst die These im Kontext des Projektablaufs in Abschnitt 1 vor. Anschließend fasse ich die Methoden und Erkenntnisse aus den Projektpublikationen zu den untersuchten Sprachen zusammen. Dort stelle ich auch die relevanten Konzepte und die Terminologie vor, die in der Literatur als mögliche Prädiktoren für Interkomprehension und Verarbeitungsschwierigkeiten angesehen werden. KAPITEL II enthält eine quantitative (Abschnitt 4) und eine qualitative (Abschnitt 5) Analyse der Ergebnisse der kooperativen Übersetzungsexperimente. Der Fokus dieser Arbeit – das Sprachenpaar PL-CS – wird erläutert und die Hypothesen werden in Abschnitt 6 vorgestellt. Die Experiment-Website wird in Abschnitt 7 mit einer Übersicht über die Teilnehmer, die verschiedenen durchgeführten Experimente und die Abschnitte, in denen sie besprochen werden, vorgestellt. In KAPITEL IV werden Experimente zur freien Übersetzung besprochen, bei denen tschechischen Lesern zwei verschiedene Sätze einzelner Wortstimuli präsentiert wurden: (i) Kognaten, die mit regulären PL-CS-Korrespondenzen umgewandelt werden können (Abschnitt 12) und (ii) die 100 häufigsten PL-Substantive (Abschnitt 13). KAPITEL V stellt die Ergebnisse von Experimenten vor, in denen tschechischen Lesern PL-NP in zwei verschiedenen Linearisierungszuständen präsentiert wurden (Abschnitt 14.1-14.6). Einen kurzen Exkurs mache ich, wenn ich mich den Experimenten mit PL-Internationalismen zuwende, die deutschen Lesern präsentiert wurden (14.7). KAPITEL VI erörtert die Methoden und Ergebnisse von Lückentexten mit hochgradig vorhersehbaren Zielwörtern im Satzkontext (Abschnitt 15) und Zufallskontext mit Sätzen aus den kooperativen Übersetzungsexperimenten (Abschnitt 16). Eine abschließende Synthese der Ergebnisse und ein Ausblick finden sich in KAPITEL VII.

• https://publikationen.sulb.uni-saarland.de/handle/20.500.11880/32995
• https://doi.org/10.22028/D291-32708

@phdthesis{Jagrova_Diss_2019,
title = {Reading Polish with Czech Eyes: Distance and Surprisal in Quantitative, Qualitative, and Error Analyses of Intelligibility},
author = {Kl{\'a}ra J{\'a}grov{\'a}},
url = {https://publikationen.sulb.uni-saarland.de/handle/20.500.11880/32995},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.22028/D291-32708},
year = {2019},
date = {2019},
school = {Saarland University},
address = {Saarbruecken, Germany},
abstract = {In CHAPTER I, I first introduce the thesis in the context of the project workflow in section 1. I then summarise the methods and findings from the project publications about the languages in focus. There I also introduce the relevant concepts and terminology viewed in the literature as possible predictors of intercomprehension and processing difficulty. CHAPTER II presents a quantitative (section 4) and a qualitative (section 5) analysis of the results of the cooperative translation experiments. The focus of this thesis – the language pair PL-CS – is explained and the hypotheses are introduced in section 6. The experiment website is introduced in section 7 with an overview over participants, the different experiments conducted and in which section they are discussed. In CHAPTER IV, free translation experiments are discussed in which two different sets of individual word stimuli were presented to Czech readers: (i) Cognates that are transformable with regular PL-CS correspondences (section 12) and (ii) the 100 most frequent PL nouns (section 13). CHAPTER V presents the findings of experiments in which PL NPs in two different linearisation conditions were presented to Czech readers (section 14.1-14.6). A short digression is made when I turn to experiments with PL internationalisms which were presented to German readers (14.7). CHAPTER VI discusses the methods and results of cloze translation experiments with highly predictable target words in sentential context (section 15) and random context with sentences from the cooperative translation experiments (section 16). A final synthesis of the findings, together with an outlook, is provided in CHAPTER VII.

---

In KAPITEL I stelle ich zun{\"a}chst die These im Kontext des Projektablaufs in Abschnitt 1 vor. Anschlie{\ss}end fasse ich die Methoden und Erkenntnisse aus den Projektpublikationen zu den untersuchten Sprachen zusammen. Dort stelle ich auch die relevanten Konzepte und die Terminologie vor, die in der Literatur als m{\"o}gliche Pr{\"a}diktoren f{\"u}r Interkomprehension und Verarbeitungsschwierigkeiten angesehen werden. KAPITEL II enth{\"a}lt eine quantitative (Abschnitt 4) und eine qualitative (Abschnitt 5) Analyse der Ergebnisse der kooperativen {\"U}bersetzungsexperimente. Der Fokus dieser Arbeit - das Sprachenpaar PL-CS - wird erl{\"a}utert und die Hypothesen werden in Abschnitt 6 vorgestellt. Die Experiment-Website wird in Abschnitt 7 mit einer {\"U}bersicht {\"u}ber die Teilnehmer, die verschiedenen durchgef{\"u}hrten Experimente und die Abschnitte, in denen sie besprochen werden, vorgestellt. In KAPITEL IV werden Experimente zur freien {\"U}bersetzung besprochen, bei denen tschechischen Lesern zwei verschiedene S{\"a}tze einzelner Wortstimuli pr{\"a}sentiert wurden: (i) Kognaten, die mit regul{\"a}ren PL-CS-Korrespondenzen umgewandelt werden k{\"o}nnen (Abschnitt 12) und (ii) die 100 h{\"a}ufigsten PL-Substantive (Abschnitt 13). KAPITEL V stellt die Ergebnisse von Experimenten vor, in denen tschechischen Lesern PL-NP in zwei verschiedenen Linearisierungszust{\"a}nden pr{\"a}sentiert wurden (Abschnitt 14.1-14.6). Einen kurzen Exkurs mache ich, wenn ich mich den Experimenten mit PL-Internationalismen zuwende, die deutschen Lesern pr{\"a}sentiert wurden (14.7). KAPITEL VI er{\"o}rtert die Methoden und Ergebnisse von L{\"u}ckentexten mit hochgradig vorhersehbaren Zielw{\"o}rtern im Satzkontext (Abschnitt 15) und Zufallskontext mit S{\"a}tzen aus den kooperativen {\"U}bersetzungsexperimenten (Abschnitt 16). Eine abschlie{\ss}ende Synthese der Ergebnisse und ein Ausblick finden sich in KAPITEL VII.},
pubstate = {published},
type = {phdthesis}
}

Copy BibTeX to Clipboard

• popr_www_specjalna_2019.indd_     (1.46MB)

@article{Jágrová2019,
title = {Slavische Interkomprehension im 5-Sprachen-Kurs – Dokumentation eines Semesters},
author = {Kl{\'a}ra J{\'a}grov{\'a} and Irina Stenger and Magdalena Telus},
year = {2019},
date = {2019},
journal = {Polnisch in Deutschland. Zeitschrift der Bundesvereinigung der Polnischlehrkr{\"a}fte. Sondernummer: Emil Krebs und die Mehrsprachigkeit in Europa},
pages = {122–133},
pubstate = {published},
type = {article}
}

Copy BibTeX to Clipboard

Die slavischen Sprachen stellen einen bedeutenden indogermanischen Sprachzweig dar. Es stellt sich die Frage, inwieweit sich Sprecher verschiedener slavischer Sprachen interkomprehensiv verständigen können. Unter Interkomprehension wird die Kommunikationsfähigkeit von Sprechern verwandter Sprachen verstanden, wobei sich jeder Sprecher seiner Sprache bedient. Die vorliegende Arbeit untersucht die orthographische Verständlichkeit slavischer Sprachen mit kyrillischer Schrift im interkomprehensiven Lesen. Sechs ost- und südslavische Sprachen – Bulgarisch, Makedonisch, Russisch, Serbisch, Ukrainisch und Weißrussisch – werden im Hinblick auf orthographische Ähnlichkeiten und Unterschiede miteinander verglichen und statistisch analysiert. Der Fokus der empirischen Untersuchung liegt auf der Erkennung einzelner Kognaten mit diachronisch motivierten orthographischen Korrespondenzen in ost- und südslavischen Sprachen, ausgehend vom Russischen. Die in dieser Arbeit vorgestellten Methoden und erzielten Ergebnisse stellen einen empirischen Beitrag zur slavischen Interkomprehensionsforschung und Interkomrepehensionsdidaktik dar.

• Zur_Rolle_der_Orthographie_in_der_slavischen_Interkomprehension     (5.71MB)

@phdthesis{Stenger_diss_2019,
title = {Zur Rolle der Orthographie in der slavischen Interkomprehension mit besonderem Fokus auf die kyrillische Schrift},
author = {Irina Stenger},
year = {2019},
date = {2019},
school = {Saarland University},
address = {Saarbr{\"u}cken, Germany},
abstract = {Die slavischen Sprachen stellen einen bedeutenden indogermanischen Sprachzweig dar. Es stellt sich die Frage, inwieweit sich Sprecher verschiedener slavischer Sprachen interkomprehensiv verst{\"a}ndigen k{\"o}nnen. Unter Interkomprehension wird die Kommunikationsf{\"a}higkeit von Sprechern verwandter Sprachen verstanden, wobei sich jeder Sprecher seiner Sprache bedient. Die vorliegende Arbeit untersucht die orthographische Verst{\"a}ndlichkeit slavischer Sprachen mit kyrillischer Schrift im interkomprehensiven Lesen. Sechs ost- und s{\"u}dslavische Sprachen - Bulgarisch, Makedonisch, Russisch, Serbisch, Ukrainisch und Wei{\ss}russisch - werden im Hinblick auf orthographische {\"A}hnlichkeiten und Unterschiede miteinander verglichen und statistisch analysiert. Der Fokus der empirischen Untersuchung liegt auf der Erkennung einzelner Kognaten mit diachronisch motivierten orthographischen Korrespondenzen in ost- und s{\"u}dslavischen Sprachen, ausgehend vom Russischen. Die in dieser Arbeit vorgestellten Methoden und erzielten Ergebnisse stellen einen empirischen Beitrag zur slavischen Interkomprehensionsforschung und Interkomrepehensionsdidaktik dar.},
pubstate = {published},
type = {phdthesis}
}

Copy BibTeX to Clipboard

• http://www.dialog-21.ru/digest/2019/online/

@inproceedings{Stenger2019,
title = {Interaction of linguistic and socio-cognitive factors in receptive multilingualism [Vzaimodejstvie lingvisti{\v{c}eskich i sociokognitivnych parametrov pri receptivnom mul’tilingvisme]},
author = {Irina Stenger and Tania Avgustinova and Konstantin I. Belousov and Dmitrij A. Baranov and Elena V. Erofeeva},
url = {http://www.dialog-21.ru/digest/2019/online/},
year = {2019},
date = {2019},
booktitle = {25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies (Dialogue 2019)},
address = {Moscow, Russia},
pubstate = {published},
type = {inproceedings}
}

Copy BibTeX to Clipboard

Languages may be differently distant from each other and their mutual intelligibility may be asymmetric. In this paper we introduce incom.py, a toolbox for calculating linguistic distances and asymmetries between related languages. incom.py allows linguist experts to quickly and easily perform statistical analyses and compare those with experimental results. We demonstrate the efficacy of incom.py in an incomprehension experiment on two Slavic languages: Bulgarian and Russian. Using incom.py we were able to validate three methods to measure linguistic distances and asymmetries: Levenshtein distance, word adaptation surprisal, and conditional entropy as predictors of success in a reading intercomprehension experiment.

• RANLP094     (0.63MB)
• https://aclanthology.org/R19-1094/
• https://doi.org/10.26615/978-954-452-056-4_094

@inproceedings{Mosbach2019,
title = {incom.py - A Toolbox for Calculating Linguistic Distances and Asymmetries between Related Languages},
author = {Marius Mosbach and Irina Stenger and Tania Avgustinova and Dietrich Klakow},
editor = {Galia Angelova and Ruslan Mitkov and Ivelina Nikolova and Irina Temnikova},
url = {https://aclanthology.org/R19-1094/},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.26615/978-954-452-056-4_094},
year = {2019},
date = {2019},
booktitle = {Proceedings of Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, RANLP 2019, Varna, Bulgaria, 2-4 September 2019},
pages = {811-819},
address = {Varna, Bulgaria},
abstract = {Languages may be differently distant from each other and their mutual intelligibility may be asymmetric. In this paper we introduce incom.py, a toolbox for calculating linguistic distances and asymmetries between related languages. incom.py allows linguist experts to quickly and easily perform statistical analyses and compare those with experimental results. We demonstrate the efficacy of incom.py in an incomprehension experiment on two Slavic languages: Bulgarian and Russian. Using incom.py we were able to validate three methods to measure linguistic distances and asymmetries: Levenshtein distance, word adaptation surprisal, and conditional entropy as predictors of success in a reading intercomprehension experiment.},
pubstate = {published},
type = {inproceedings}
}

Copy BibTeX to Clipboard

This contribution outlines an international research effort for creating a typology of syntactic idioms on the borderline of the dictionary and the grammar. Recent studies focusing on the adequate description of such units, especially for modern Russian, have resulted in two types of linguistic resources: a microsyntactic dictionary of Russian, and a microsyntactically annotated corpus of Russian texts. Our goal now is to discover to what extent the findings can be generalized cross-linguistically in order to create analogous multilingual resources. The initial work consists in constructing a typology of relevant phenomena. The empirical base is provided by closely related languages which are mutually intelligible to various degrees. We start by creating an inventory for this typology for four representative Slavic languages: Russian (East Slavic), Bulgarian (South Slavic), Polish and Czech (West Slavic). Our preliminary results show that the aim is attainable and can be of relevance to theoretical, comparative and applied linguistics as well as in NLP tasks.

• https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-30135-4_2

@inproceedings{Avgustinova2019,
title = {Towards a Typology of Microsyntactic Constructions},
author = {Tania Avgustinova and Leonid Iomdin},
editor = {Gloria Corpas-Pastor and Ruslan Mitkov},
url = {https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-30135-4_2},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-09-18},
booktitle = {Computational and Corpus-Based Phraseology},
pages = {15-30},
publisher = {Springer, Cham},
abstract = {This contribution outlines an international research effort for creating a typology of syntactic idioms on the borderline of the dictionary and the grammar. Recent studies focusing on the adequate description of such units, especially for modern Russian, have resulted in two types of linguistic resources: a microsyntactic dictionary of Russian, and a microsyntactically annotated corpus of Russian texts. Our goal now is to discover to what extent the findings can be generalized cross-linguistically in order to create analogous multilingual resources. The initial work consists in constructing a typology of relevant phenomena. The empirical base is provided by closely related languages which are mutually intelligible to various degrees. We start by creating an inventory for this typology for four representative Slavic languages: Russian (East Slavic), Bulgarian (South Slavic), Polish and Czech (West Slavic). Our preliminary results show that the aim is attainable and can be of relevance to theoretical, comparative and applied linguistics as well as in NLP tasks.},
pubstate = {published},
type = {inproceedings}
}

Copy BibTeX to Clipboard

In monolingual human language processing, the predictability of a word given its surrounding sentential context is crucial. With regard to receptive multilingualism, it is unclear to what extent predictability in context interplays with other linguistic factors in understanding a related but unknown language – a process called intercomprehension. We distinguish two dimensions influencing processing effort during intercomprehension: surprisal in sentential context and linguistic distance.

Based on this hypothesis, we formulate expectations regarding the difficulty of designed experimental stimuli and compare them to the results from think-aloud protocols of experiments in which Czech native speakers decode Polish sentences by agreeing on an appropriate translation. On the one hand, orthographic and lexical distances are reliable predictors of linguistic similarity. On the other hand, we obtain the predictability of words in a sentence with the help of trigram language models.

We find that linguistic distance (encoding similarity) and in-context surprisal (predictability in context) appear to be complementary, with neither factor outweighing the other, and that our distinguishing of these two measurable dimensions is helpful in understanding certain unexpected effects in human behaviour.

• https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885230817300451

@article{Jágrová2018b,
title = {Language models, surprisal and fantasy in Slavic intercomprehension},
author = {Kl{\'a}ra J{\'a}grov{\'a} and Tania Avgustinova and Irina Stenger and Andrea Fischer},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885230817300451},
year = {2018},
date = {2018},
journal = {Computer Speech & Language},
abstract = {In monolingual human language processing, the predictability of a word given its surrounding sentential context is crucial. With regard to receptive multilingualism, it is unclear to what extent predictability in context interplays with other linguistic factors in understanding a related but unknown language – a process called intercomprehension. We distinguish two dimensions influencing processing effort during intercomprehension: surprisal in sentential context and linguistic distance. Based on this hypothesis, we formulate expectations regarding the difficulty of designed experimental stimuli and compare them to the results from think-aloud protocols of experiments in which Czech native speakers decode Polish sentences by agreeing on an appropriate translation. On the one hand, orthographic and lexical distances are reliable predictors of linguistic similarity. On the other hand, we obtain the predictability of words in a sentence with the help of trigram language models. We find that linguistic distance (encoding similarity) and in-context surprisal (predictability in context) appear to be complementary, with neither factor outweighing the other, and that our distinguishing of these two measurable dimensions is helpful in understanding certain unexpected effects in human behaviour.},
pubstate = {published},
type = {article}
}

Copy BibTeX to Clipboard

• www_gazeta_2017     (1.72MB)

@article{Jágrová2018,
title = {Polski nadal nieskomplikowany? Interkomprehensionsexperimente mit Nominalphrasen},
author = {Kl{\'a}ra J{\'a}grov{\'a} and Irina Stenger and Tania Avgustinova},
year = {2018},
date = {2018},
journal = {Polnisch in Deutschland. Zeitschrift der Bundesvereinigung der Polnischlehrkr{\"a}fte},
pages = {20-37},
volume = {5/2017},
pubstate = {published},
type = {article}
}

Copy BibTeX to Clipboard

• http://www.cys.cic.ipn.mx/ojs/index.php/CyS/article/view/2865

@article{Fischer2017,
title = {Beyond Pairwise Similarity: Quantifying and Characterizing Linguistic Similarity between Groups of Languages by MDL},
author = {Andrea Fischer and Jilles Vreeken and Dietrich Klakow},
url = {http://www.cys.cic.ipn.mx/ojs/index.php/CyS/article/view/2865},
year = {2017},
date = {2017},
journal = {Computación y Systems},
pages = {829-839},
volume = {21},
number = {4},
abstract = {

},
pubstate = {published},
type = {article}
}

Copy BibTeX to Clipboard

• olinco-2016-proceedings     (4.67MB)

@inproceedings{Klára2017,
title = {Lexical and orthographic distances between Bulgarian, Czech, Polish, and Russian: A comparative analysis of the most frequent nouns},
author = {Kl{\'a}ra J{\'a}grov{\'a} and Irina Stenger and Roland Marti and Tania Avgustinova},
year = {2017},
date = {2017},
booktitle = {Joseph Emonds & Mark{\'e}ta Janebov{\'a} (eds.), Language Use and Linguistic Structure. Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium 2016},
pages = {401–416},
address = {Olomouc: Palacký University},
pubstate = {published},
type = {inproceedings}
}

Copy BibTeX to Clipboard

• https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/nordic-journal-of-linguistics/article/modeling-the-impact-of-orthographic-coding-on-czechpolish-and-bulgarianrussian-reading-intercomprehension/363BEB5C556DFBDAC7FEED0AE06B06AA

@article{Stenger2017b,
title = {Modeling the Impact of Orthographic Coding on Czech-Polish and Bulgarian-Russian Reading Intercomprehension},
author = {Irina Stenger and Kl{\'a}ra J{\'a}grov{\'a} and Andrea Fischer and Tania Avgustinova and Dietrich Klakow and Roland Marti},
url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/nordic-journal-of-linguistics/article/modeling-the-impact-of-orthographic-coding-on-czechpolish-and-bulgarianrussian-reading-intercomprehension/363BEB5C556DFBDAC7FEED0AE06B06AA},
year = {2017},
date = {2017},
journal = {Nordic Journal of Linguistic},
pages = {175-199},
volume = {40},
number = {2},
abstract = {

},
pubstate = {published},
type = {article}
}

Copy BibTeX to Clipboard

In this article we validate two measuring methods: Levenshtein distance and word adaptation surprisal as potential predictors of success in reading intercomprehension. We investigate to what extent orthographic distances between Russian and other East Slavic (Ukrainian, Belarusian) and South Slavic (Bulgarian, Macedonian, Serbian) languages found by means of the Levenshtein algorithm and word adaptation surprisal correlate with comprehension of unknown Slavic languages on the basis of data obtained from Russian native speakers in online free translation task experiments. We try to find an answer to the following question: Can measuring methods such as Levenshtein distance and word adaptation surprisal be considered as a good approximation of orthographic intelligibility of unknown Slavic languages using the Cyrillic script?

• dialogue2017_v1     (6.95MB)
• https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Levenshtein-Distance-anD-WorD-aDaptation-surprisaL-Distance/6103d388cb0398b89dec8ca36ec0be025bb6dea2

@inproceedings{Stenger2017,
title = {Levenshtein distance and word adaptation surprisal as methods of measuring mutual intelligibility in reading comprehension of Slavic languages},
author = {Irina Stenger and Tania Avgustinova and Roland Marti},
url = {https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Levenshtein-Distance-anD-WorD-aDaptation-surprisaL-Distance/6103d388cb0398b89dec8ca36ec0be025bb6dea2},
year = {2017},
date = {2017},
booktitle = {Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies: International Conference "Dialogue 2017"},
pages = {304-317},
abstract = {In this article we validate two measuring methods: Levenshtein distance and word adaptation surprisal as potential predictors of success in reading intercomprehension. We investigate to what extent orthographic distances between Russian and other East Slavic (Ukrainian, Belarusian) and South Slavic (Bulgarian, Macedonian, Serbian) languages found by means of the Levenshtein algorithm and word adaptation surprisal correlate with comprehension of unknown Slavic languages on the basis of data obtained from Russian native speakers in online free translation task experiments. We try to find an answer to the following question: Can measuring methods such as Levenshtein distance and word adaptation surprisal be considered as a good approximation of orthographic intelligibility of unknown Slavic languages using the Cyrillic script?},
pubstate = {published},
type = {inproceedings}
}

Copy BibTeX to Clipboard

@article{Jágrová2017,
title = {POLSKI TO JEZYK NIESKOMPLIKOWANY? Theoretische und praktische Interkomprehension der 100 h{\"a}ufigsten polnischen Substantive},
author = {Kl{\'a}ra J{\'a}grov{\'a} and Irina Stenger and Tania Avgustinova and Roland Marti},
year = {2017},
date = {2017},
journal = {In Polnisch in Deutschland. Zeitschrift der Bundesvereinigung der Polnischlehrkr{\"a}fte},
pages = {5-19},
volume = {4/2016},
pubstate = {published},
type = {article}
}

Copy BibTeX to Clipboard

• https://esslli2016.unibz.it/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/esslli-stus-2016-proceedings.pdf

@inproceedings{Stenger2016,
title = {How reading intercomprehension works among Slavic languages with Cyrillic script},
author = {Irina Stenger},
editor = {Marisa K{\"o}llner and Ramon Ziai},
url = {https://esslli2016.unibz.it/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/esslli-stus-2016-proceedings.pdf},
year = {2016},
date = {2016},
pages = {30-42},
publisher = {ESSLLI 2016},
pubstate = {published},
type = {inproceedings}
}

Copy BibTeX to Clipboard

• sfb-b1-coll-C4-March2015     (0.51MB)

@inproceedings{andrea2015models,
title = {Models for Mutual Intelligibility},
author = {Andrea Fischer and Kl{\'a}ra J{\'a}grov{\'a} and Irina Stenger and Tania Avgustinova and Dietrich Klakow and Roland Marti},
year = {2015},
date = {2015},
booktitle = {Data Mining and its Use and Usability for Linguistic Analysis},
publisher = {Universit{\"a}t des Saarlandes},
address = {Saarbr{\"u}cken, Germany},
pubstate = {published},
type = {inproceedings}
}

Copy BibTeX to Clipboard

This article presents the methods and findings of a computational transformation of orthography within two Slavic language pairs (Czech­Polish and Bulgarian­Russian) on different word sets. The experiment aimed at investigating to what extent these closely related languages are mutually intelligible, concentrating on their orthographies as linguistic interfaces to the written text. Besides analyzing orthographic similarity, the aim was to gain insights into the applicability of rules based on traditional linguistic assumptions for the purposes of language modelling.

• https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/231c7c8a9b94a872a7396d5b1a1ef7962/sfb1102

@inproceedings{klara2015orthography,
title = {An Orthography Transformation Experiment with Czech-Polish and Bulgarian-Russian Parallel Word Sets},
author = {Andrea Fischer and Kl{\'a}ra J{\'a}grov{\'a} and Irina Stenger and Tania Avgustinova and Dietrich Klakow and Roland Marti},
editor = {Bernadette Sharp and Wiesław Lubaszewski and Rodolfo Delmonte},
url = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/231c7c8a9b94a872a7396d5b1a1ef7962/sfb1102},
year = {2015},
date = {2015},
booktitle = {Natural Language Processing and Cognitive Science},
pages = {115-126},
publisher = {Ca Foscarina Editrice, Venezia},
abstract = {This article presents the methods and findings of a computational transformation of orthography within two Slavic language pairs (Czech­Polish and Bulgarian­Russian) on different word sets. The experiment aimed at investigating to what extent these closely related languages are mutually intelligible, concentrating on their orthographies as linguistic interfaces to the written text. Besides analyzing orthographic similarity, the aim was to gain insights into the applicability of rules based on traditional linguistic assumptions for the purposes of language modelling.},
pubstate = {published},
type = {inproceedings}
}

Copy BibTeX to Clipboard

The possibility of intercomprehension between related languages is a generally accepted fact suggesting that mutual intelligibility is systematic. Of particular interest are the Slavic languages, which are “sufficiently similar and sufficiently different to provide an attractive research laboratory” (Corbett 1998). They exhibit practically all typologically attested means of encoding grammatical information, ranging from extremely dense to highly redundant constructions, and their development is the result of various language contact scenarios (Balkansprachbund, German influence on West Slavic languages, Finno-Ugric substratum in East Slavic languages etc.).

• REMU-slides-presentation_2015-05-28     (0.63MB)
• https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/187b1c53b1bad76027e0a305d2a6e2cce/sfb1102

@inproceedings{tania2015empirical,
title = {The Empirical Basis of Slavic Intercomprehension},
author = {Tania Avgustinova and Andrea Fischer and Kl{\'a}ra J{\'a}grov{\'a} and Irina Stenger},
url = {https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/187b1c53b1bad76027e0a305d2a6e2cce/sfb1102},
year = {2015},
date = {2015},
booktitle = {REMU},
address = {Joensuu, Finland},
abstract = {The possibility of intercomprehension between related languages is a generally accepted fact suggesting that mutual intelligibility is systematic. Of particular interest are the Slavic languages, which are “sufficiently similar and sufficiently different to provide an attractive research laboratory” (Corbett 1998). They exhibit practically all typologically attested means of encoding grammatical information, ranging from extremely dense to highly redundant constructions, and their development is the result of various language contact scenarios (Balkansprachbund, German influence on West Slavic languages, Finno-Ugric substratum in East Slavic languages etc.).},
pubstate = {published},
type = {inproceedings}
}

Copy BibTeX to Clipboard

As dialog systems are getting more and more ubiquitous, there is an increasing number of application domains for natural language generation, and generation objectives are getting more diverse (e.g., generating informationally dense vs. less complex utterances, as a function of target user and usage situation). Flexible generation is difficult and labourintensive with traditional template-based generation systems, while fully data-driven approaches may lead to less grammatical output, particularly if the measures used for generation objectives are correlated with measures of grammaticality. We here explore the combination of a data-driven approach with two very simple automatic grammar induction methods, basing its implementation on OpenCCG.

• https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W15-4718/

@inproceedings{fischer:demberg:klakow,
title = {Towards Flexible, Small-Domain Surface Generation: Combining Data-Driven and Grammatical Approaches},
author = {Andrea Fischer and Vera Demberg and Dietrich Klakow},
url = {https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W15-4718/},
year = {2015},
date = {2015},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 15th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation (ENLG)},
pages = {105-108},
publisher = {Association for Computational Linguistics},
address = {Brighton, England, UK},
abstract = {As dialog systems are getting more and more ubiquitous, there is an increasing number of application domains for natural language generation, and generation objectives are getting more diverse (e.g., generating informationally dense vs. less complex utterances, as a function of target user and usage situation). Flexible generation is difficult and labourintensive with traditional template-based generation systems, while fully data-driven approaches may lead to less grammatical output, particularly if the measures used for generation objectives are correlated with measures of grammaticality. We here explore the combination of a data-driven approach with two very simple automatic grammar induction methods, basing its implementation on OpenCCG.},
pubstate = {published},
type = {inproceedings}
}

Copy BibTeX to Clipboard