(Dis-)confirmation of linguistic prediction by non-linguistic cues Miscellaneous
24th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP), Berlin, 2018.Gaze Cues in face-to-face interactions
- Speakers‘ direct their gaze toward an object approximately 800ms before mentioning. (Griffin & Bock, 2000)
- Previous studies showed that listeners utilize speakers‘ gaze to form predictions about the unfolding sentence. (Jachmann et al., 2017)
- Do listeners utilize this external cue to validate expectations about the unfolding sentence? And, if so, how does this effect the comprehension of the noun?
@miscellaneous{Jachmann2018,
title = {(Dis-)confirmation of linguistic prediction by non-linguistic cues},
author = {Torsten Jachmann and Heiner Drenhaus and Maria Staudte and Matthew W. Crocker},
url = {https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327623334_DISCONFIRMATION_OF_LINGUISTIC_PREDICTION_BY_NON-LINGUISTIC_CUES},
year = {2018},
date = {2018},
booktitle = {24th Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP)},
address = {Berlin},
abstract = {Gaze Cues in face-to-face interactions
- Speakers‘ direct their gaze toward an object approximately 800ms before mentioning. (Griffin & Bock, 2000)
- Previous studies showed that listeners utilize speakers‘ gaze to form predictions about the unfolding sentence. (Jachmann et al., 2017)
- Do listeners utilize this external cue to validate expectations about the unfolding sentence? And, if so, how does this effect the comprehension of the noun?
pubstate = {published},
type = {miscellaneous}
}